Containment Before Contact
No approach, no signaling, and no physical interaction until class is assigned and a containment tier is set. Restrictive posture is the default, not the exception.
About
InterLife Readiness Systems™ is an independent standards program of CCM Medical Services. It publishes one standardized United States doctrine for arriving life forms, synthetic entities, and vessels — detection, containment, medical screening, classification, communication, and lawful disposition.
If an emergent life form or unidentified vessel arrived tomorrow, no agency holds a single approved procedure for screening it, containing it, classifying it, or deciding its status.
Existing authorities are fragmented: airspace control in one department, quarantine power in another, planetary protection in a third, custody and disclosure in a fourth. In an actual arrival event, that fragmentation is the hazard.
This doctrine closes the gap with a common classification vocabulary, a fixed escalation ladder, containment tiers, and standardized documentation any agency can adopt as written — before an event, not during one.
The doctrine is grounded in
Six principles govern the classification system, containment tiers, and response sequence. Where a specific procedure is silent, these principles decide the action.
No approach, no signaling, and no physical interaction until class is assigned and a containment tier is set. Restrictive posture is the default, not the exception.
Any entity with biological features is a medical and biosafety problem first: pathogen screening, exposure control, and personnel protection precede all other decisions.
A county paramedic, an airman, and a cabinet-level office describe the same arrival the same way — Class I through V, Tier 1 through 4, Phase 1 through 6.
Lead agency is assigned by entity class before an event, so no two authorities can assert command over the same arrival while containment waits.
Each phase closes with a standardized packet and a named authorizing signature, so actions taken during an arrival event can be defended afterward.
Quarantine power, airspace control, planetary protection, custody of evidence, and disclosure sequencing — the doctrine operates inside authorities that already exist.
The program states its stage openly, so reviewing bodies know exactly what they are evaluating.
The entity classification system, containment tiers, six-phase response sequence, communication protocol, legal basis, and documentation packets are complete and published for agency review.
Departments run the doctrine against their standing authorities and chain of command, then adopt it as written or under a mapped departmental annex.
Tabletop and field exercises produce After-Action Reports, and reviewer findings feed directly into the next doctrine revision.
What this doctrine does not claim
InterLife Readiness Systems™ is not a government agency and asserts no federal authority, custody, or jurisdiction over arrival events. It does not represent any agency's current position. It is a proposed standard — the procedure that lawful authorities can adopt and operate under, published for their review.
Direct lines
Briefings are open to defense, public health, emergency management, airspace, and research bodies reviewing the arrival doctrine.
Agency briefings walk through entity classification, containment tiers, the six-phase response sequence, and legal basis, and collect reviewer findings for the next revision.